王静丽

王静丽的博客

她的个人主页  她的博客

TOPIC: ISSUE168

王静丽  2009年07月29日 星期三 01:31 | 2424次浏览 | 8条评论

"Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field."

TOPIC: ISSUE168 - "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field."

 

With the high-technology leading to more complexities and issues, we are faced with lot of information to make a decision, and also we have stepped into an age of experts, to whom we turn for help and advice, and we believe in experts more than any time in human history. However, not all the time only the experts' critical judgment of work has value, in fact, the public's views also has great value, which cannot be replaced.

 

It is really the fact that we are living in an age of believing in experts. Because that we are faced with plenty of problems every day , meanwhile are in the sea of all kinds of information; therefore, in order to solve the puzzles, we have to step into an age of experts, and we are accustomed   to turn to experts for help or advice of the issues, from the small ones, such as what colour of the nail polish fits us better, to the big ones, such as where our nation will go in the financial crisis. From the presentation above, we can know that we trust in experts and experts really valuable to us, in other words, experts have been a inevitably consequence of the times.    

 

However, that experts' critical judgment of work is of great value does not mean that others' judgment is not. Actually, in many aspects, the judgment really contributes to the work. For example, in the film field, if the director wants to make a great film, the most important thing for him or her is thinking how to satisfy the audience, but not the experts of film. That is to say, he or she have to take the audience' judgment into account, but not the film critics’ judgment. Thus, from this we can conclude that the public's views are of great value, which cannot be ignored or look down upon.

 

What's more, the public's judgment is not only valuable , but also important for the work, because there are some experts, who are not responsible at all, mislead the public. In such occasions , the public's judgment can be a strong supervision upon the experts. This phenomenon occurs so often in the field of ads, which is called the new century's arts. Many experts in ads often exaggerate the function of the products, without testing the products by themselves, especially in medicine and cosmetics ads. Experience has told us painful lessons, such as the cancer patient gets worse and worse, even nearly loses life, just because of taking the medicine in the ads, recommended by some famous cancer experts, a beautiful girl nearly disfigures just because of using the cosmetics in the ads, recommended by some experts of this field. Therefore, the public's judgment is a supervision to urge the experts responsible , and thus, their judgment is of great value as the experts.

 

In conclusion, experts' judgement is more rationable and authorible, and contributes a lot to the work; while others' judgment not only contributes to the work, but also is a pressure for the experts to be responsible enough, which in fact is also another kind of judgment, maybe indirect judgment, however, badly needed.

评论

我的评论:

发表评论

请 登录 后发表评论。还没有在Zeuux哲思注册吗?现在 注册 !
林振华

回复 林振华  2009年08月02日 星期日 15:01

整体上写得不错,单词要能再深刻一点就非常好了。

3条回复

  • 王静丽

    回复 王静丽  2009年08月02日 星期日 23:08

    你是说单词不够形象吗 还是例子等太单薄 没有说服力 再过几天就要考试了 现在不知道最该做什么了 打字打的觉得很耗费心力

    2条回复

      • 林振华

        回复 林振华  2009年08月03日 星期一 18:08

        考试哦,那应该没问题。我想考商务英语中级的,就怕口试。我们国内的学生口语大多都比较薄弱。

        0条回复

      • 孙铭阳

        回复 孙铭阳  2009年08月02日 星期日 23:38

        我觉得例子和逻辑没什么问题了。毕竟题目里说的是 any given field,因此理论上只要提出一个领域里非 expert 的 critics 是有意义的就算成功驳斥了。只是第二段可能有一点小问题,因为这个题目说的貌似不是是否 believe in experts,而是大众是否有能力评论 experts 的问题。所以第二段的缓和作用可能不是很大。我觉得应该写的是类似 诚然,非 experts 在一些领域是几乎没有发言权的,比如基础科学研究,blabla... 但是在大多数与大众日常生活联系紧密的领域,非 experts 是很有发言权的,然后高兴的写出后面两段~~

        当然这个是小问题,阅卷的人很可能都来不及看出来。

        ,对了,如果你信鸡精的话最后一两天可以看看鸡精,然后写写提纲

        0条回复

孙铭阳

回复 孙铭阳  2009年07月31日 星期五 19:02

原来是 GRE 作文啊~ 赞!难怪这么长。
人感觉用词有点重复,比如出现了好多 age of experts,以及 "value" 的各种变体...
不过我 gre 作文 3.5 呵呵,只能看出问题,没法给出建议-_-

1条回复

邓楠

回复 邓楠  2009年07月30日 星期四 14:09

想说点什么,不过写的不错,我也不知道怎么说了。有个小意见:颜色(color)这个词最好别用colour,用color就可以了,一来少打一个字母,二来,GRE是美国考试,按照美国的习惯比较好。不过不是什么大毛病。

1条回复

  • 王静丽

    回复 王静丽  2009年07月30日 星期四 23:15

    哦 好

    原来你觉得写的不错啊

    哈哈

    我太高兴了 继续努力~~~

    0条回复

暂时没有评论

Zeuux © 2024

京ICP备05028076号